In your view, is there a minimum purity percentage that is broadly accepted before you would run a peptide in research?
Or does it vary by peptide?
Take these cases:
For myself, 99%+ is where many of my peps have landed, which I clearly take as good, yet one kit came in at 96.5% and another at 98.3%. So now I question where the line belongs.
Or does it vary by peptide?
Take these cases:
- For certain peptides is 95% fine, while for others it is not?
- Are 98%+ or 99%+ what you look for on particular compounds?
For myself, 99%+ is where many of my peps have landed, which I clearly take as good, yet one kit came in at 96.5% and another at 98.3%. So now I question where the line belongs.