Some Real APS BPC10 kits are being recalled

[Alc23]

px1984 said:

A batch of KPV came from them and I was told the results were still pending from Jano; after a few chases they owned up to never having run the testing, and by then the batch had changed, so there wasn't much point bothering.

Testing has so few people in it that buying again from GB worked out cheaper than testing it myself.

KPV out of an earlier batch came back ok. For QWAR-A my name was on the testing group But again, the batch code mess being what it is, what I know is that 1 of the 2 vials sent in carried exactly my code

*Edited for correct batch code

 

[N Sharp]

Frustrating and disheartening, all of it — at some point I think I'm gonna have to cave and get in on GBs, since it's the only route to real confirmation. Uggh, if anyone has solid recs, lmk

 

[px1984]

Alc23 said:

px1984 said:

A batch of KPV came from them and I was told the results were still pending from Jano; after a few chases they owned up to never having run the testing, and by then the batch had changed, so there wasn't much point bothering.

Testing has so few people in it that buying again from GB worked out cheaper than testing it myself.

KPV out of an earlier batch came back ok. For QWAR-A my name was on the testing group But again, the batch code mess being what it is, what I know is that 1 of the 2 vials sent in carried exactly my code

*Edited for correct batch code

Was KPQTN the one that came out okay?

 

[Flash-BCR]

BrightCandle said:

Hello beutiful said:

BrightCandle said:

Alc23 said:

APS has added R30 to the announcement (lavender cap). Don't touch it until more testing happens

Right now APS doesn't look good at all.

The whole serial number narrative they've been telling has collapsed. Testing organised by batch number has come apart, since only the BPC-10 PYQI-A was pulled — anyone holding PYQI discovered theirs wasn't recalled. Yet for ages they insisted those suffixes (the -A part) were warehouse codes; they aren't, they're simply part of the serial number. It may carry meaning for their supplier, though what exactly is unclear, and from where we sit they are plainly different products that each need testing.

Every COA APS has ever issued has treated that suffix (-A -1) as if it didn't matter. Only R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap) has been put on hold. Assuming that makes the other REPTN batches safe would be wrong — they're just untested.

Testing at APS is in total chaos right now. Where a COA leaves its suffix undefined — muddied by the fact that the first batch frequently has none — nobody can say what was actually tested.

Right as I was getting ready to order — mind if I ask where you dig up that valuable information , knowledge is key

I sit in the 2 test groups on APS products where these problems turned up. The R30 and the BPC-10 — both failures are mine as well, and I'm a lot of $ out of pocket at this moment. Nearly all of it goes on over at STG and the APS Testing Community.

Which cap colors did the BPC that failed testing have?...Given all the cross selling between those 3-4 US 'warehouses' that could help pin down who's exposed to a potentially affected batch...

 

[BrightCandle]

Flash-BCR said:

BrightCandle said:

Hello beutiful said:

BrightCandle said:

Alc23 said:

APS has added R30 to the announcement (lavender cap). Don't touch it until more testing happens

Right now APS doesn't look good at all.

The whole serial number narrative they've been telling has collapsed. Testing organised by batch number has come apart, since only the BPC-10 PYQI-A was pulled — anyone holding PYQI discovered theirs wasn't recalled. Yet for ages they insisted those suffixes (the -A part) were warehouse codes; they aren't, they're simply part of the serial number. It may carry meaning for their supplier, though what exactly is unclear, and from where we sit they are plainly different products that each need testing.

Every COA APS has ever issued has treated that suffix (-A -1) as if it didn't matter. Only R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap) has been put on hold. Assuming that makes the other REPTN batches safe would be wrong — they're just untested.

Testing at APS is in total chaos right now. Where a COA leaves its suffix undefined — muddied by the fact that the first batch frequently has none — nobody can say what was actually tested.

Right as I was getting ready to order — mind if I ask where you dig up that valuable information , knowledge is key

I sit in the 2 test groups on APS products where these problems turned up. The R30 and the BPC-10 — both failures are mine as well, and I'm a lot of $ out of pocket at this moment. Nearly all of it goes on over at STG and the APS Testing Community.

Which cap colors did the BPC that failed testing have?...Given all the cross selling between those 3-4 US 'warehouses' that could help pin down who's exposed to a potentially affected batch...

Blue.

 

[bamagirl26]

N Sharp said:

Frustrating and disheartening, all of it — at some point I think I'm gonna have to cave and get in on GBs, since it's the only route to real confirmation. Uggh, if anyone has solid recs, lmk

I knowwwwwww!! Feeling a touch disheartened with it, because the batches I bought (or so I thought) had been 3P tested, except now nobody can say what those extra letters stand for (the story was that it was just the warehouse they shipped from, and my reaction was YIPPEEEEEE!), and now, im wondering whether the contents are actually different, but who knows. Roughly 6 months of Tirz sit between me and even needing to think about using what I bought, so Im hoping some clarity will show up. I'm trying to pull together a group of people who might want in on testing.. a US lab would put it at 100 Bucks each for 4 ppl. Not terrible.

 

[Flash-BCR]

BrightCandle said:

Flash-BCR said:

BrightCandle said:

Hello beutiful said:

BrightCandle said:

Alc23 said:

APS has added R30 to the announcement (lavender cap). Don't touch it until more testing happens

Right now APS doesn't look good at all.

The whole serial number narrative they've been telling has collapsed. Testing organised by batch number has come apart, since only the BPC-10 PYQI-A was pulled — anyone holding PYQI discovered theirs wasn't recalled. Yet for ages they insisted those suffixes (the -A part) were warehouse codes; they aren't, they're simply part of the serial number. It may carry meaning for their supplier, though what exactly is unclear, and from where we sit they are plainly different products that each need testing.

Every COA APS has ever issued has treated that suffix (-A -1) as if it didn't matter. Only R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap) has been put on hold. Assuming that makes the other REPTN batches safe would be wrong — they're just untested.

Testing at APS is in total chaos right now. Where a COA leaves its suffix undefined — muddied by the fact that the first batch frequently has none — nobody can say what was actually tested.

Right as I was getting ready to order — mind if I ask where you dig up that valuable information , knowledge is key

I sit in the 2 test groups on APS products where these problems turned up. The R30 and the BPC-10 — both failures are mine as well, and I'm a lot of $ out of pocket at this moment. Nearly all of it goes on over at STG and the APS Testing Community.

Which cap colors did the BPC that failed testing have?...Given all the cross selling between those 3-4 US 'warehouses' that could help pin down who's exposed to a potentially affected batch...

View attachment 50
Blue.

Thanks!…

 

[slowbro]

bamagirl26 said:

N Sharp said:

Frustrating and disheartening, all of it — at some point I think I'm gonna have to cave and get in on GBs, since it's the only route to real confirmation. Uggh, if anyone has solid recs, lmk

I knowwwwwww!! Feeling a touch disheartened with it, because the batches I bought (or so I thought) had been 3P tested, except now nobody can say what those extra letters stand for (the story was that it was just the warehouse they shipped from, and my reaction was YIPPEEEEEE!), and now, im wondering whether the contents are actually different, but who knows. Roughly 6 months of Tirz sit between me and even needing to think about using what I bought, so Im hoping some clarity will show up. I'm trying to pull together a group of people who might want in on testing.. a US lab would put it at 100 Bucks each for 4 ppl. Not terrible.

Which code is the one you want tested? Mine is pnpu-a1

 

[bamagirl26]

I have PNPU N2. Gut feeling is that it's all one and the same product, but I'll let a few days pass and see.

 

[QueenMuntha]

Yep, and here's the extra warning that came out today: