Some Real APS BPC10 kits are being recalled

QueenMuntha

QueenMuntha

Explorer
Joined
Jun 13, 2025
Messages
90
Reaction score
129
Location
Akron, OH
Spotted this over on Discord.





ebbf1eb9130368568e3d1cc12ac28e205147fe88412a246a7d925d24d6a9ecbd.webp


Dear Consumers:

In recent testing, we discovered that BPC10 (production batch - serial number: PYQI-A) has insufficient content/purity.

We highly value your safety and user experience.To eliminate potential risks , and protect consumer rights, customers who purchased BPC10 with batch - serial number "PYQI-A" pls contact us. We will handle the matter according to the following solutions:

① Free replacement with a brand new batch of BPC10

② Replacement with another product

③ Refund

Customers who ordered BPC10, please check the product label you received.

If it matches the label shown in the image (batch - serial number: PYQI-A), please contact us through the original ordering channel, providing your order information or transaction hash/TxID, to process a return, exchange, or refund.

We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause , and thank you for your understanding .

We will continue to strictly control product quality to ensure the safety of every user.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
jpru2001 said:

Every one of them came half filled, so the guess is that it's wolverine that got mislabeled as straight BPC — the same thing that went on with a different vendor last week as well.
Click to expand...
Wasn't SPB the one stepping on their own toes again?
 
Airborne Daddy said:

jpru2001 said:

Every one of them came half filled, so the guess is that it's wolverine that got mislabeled as straight BPC — the same thing that went on with a different vendor last week as well.
Click to expand...
Wasn't SPB the one stepping on their own toes again?
Click to expand...
yeah. their endo test that came back recently may have crossed your screen too — by far the biggest number I have ever laid eyes on.
 
Yikes, this batch is what I've been pinning for the past couple of weeks. Going at what I believed was 500mcg twice daily, and no results have shown up. Anybody know whether TB500 is actually in there, or if it's 5g of BPC and nothing more
 
slowbro said:

Yikes, this batch is what I've been pinning for the past couple of weeks. Going at what I believed was 500mcg twice daily, and no results have shown up. Anybody know whether TB500 is actually in there, or if it's 5g of BPC and nothing more
Click to expand...
The first round of testing flagged the other peptide as unidentified. Hence the retest, to work out what it actually is.
 
slowbro said:

Yikes, this batch is what I've been pinning for the past couple of weeks. Going at what I believed was 500mcg twice daily, and no results have shown up. Anybody know whether TB500 is actually in there, or if it's 5g of BPC and nothing more
Click to expand...
They'll ship a fresh kit your way
 
ColdSmoke said:

slowbro said:

Yikes, this batch is what I've been pinning for the past couple of weeks. Going at what I believed was 500mcg twice daily, and no results have shown up. Anybody know whether TB500 is actually in there, or if it's 5g of BPC and nothing more
Click to expand...
They'll ship a fresh kit your way
Click to expand...
I saw that, the shipping label is already generated for it 🙏🏻

CheetosYum said:

slowbro said:

Yikes, this batch is what I've been pinning for the past couple of weeks. Going at what I believed was 500mcg twice daily, and no results have shown up. Anybody know whether TB500 is actually in there, or if it's 5g of BPC and nothing more
Click to expand...
The first round of testing flagged the other peptide as unidentified. Hence the retest, to work out what it actually is.
Click to expand...
thanks, I'll keep an eye open for anything else. Still weighing up whether to hold on to it, and knowing what's inside would at least let me judge the dose better.
 
Alc23 said:

APS has added R30 to the announcement (lavender cap). Don't touch it until more testing happens

Right now APS doesn't look good at all.
Click to expand...
The whole serial number narrative they've been telling has collapsed. Testing organised by batch number has come apart, since only the BPC-10 PYQI-A was pulled — anyone holding PYQI discovered theirs wasn't recalled. Yet for ages they insisted those suffixes (the -A part) were warehouse codes; they aren't, they're simply part of the serial number. It may carry meaning for their supplier, though what exactly is unclear, and from where we sit they are plainly different products that each need testing.

Every COA APS has ever issued has treated that suffix (-A -1) as if it didn't matter. Only R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap) has been put on hold. Assuming that makes the other REPTN batches safe would be wrong — they're just untested.

Testing at APS is in total chaos right now. Where a COA leaves its suffix undefined — muddied by the fact that the first batch frequently has none — nobody can say what was actually tested.
 
Alc23 said:

APS has added R30 to the announcement (lavender cap). Don't touch it until more testing happens

Right now APS doesn't look good at all.
Click to expand...
Omg, an order was all but placed when I saw this — looks like someone else gets my business
 
BrightCandle said:

Alc23 said:

APS has added R30 to the announcement (lavender cap). Don't touch it until more testing happens

Right now APS doesn't look good at all.
Click to expand...
The whole serial number narrative they've been telling has collapsed. Testing organised by batch number has come apart, since only the BPC-10 PYQI-A was pulled — anyone holding PYQI discovered theirs wasn't recalled. Yet for ages they insisted those suffixes (the -A part) were warehouse codes; they aren't, they're simply part of the serial number. It may carry meaning for their supplier, though what exactly is unclear, and from where we sit they are plainly different products that each need testing.

Every COA APS has ever issued has treated that suffix (-A -1) as if it didn't matter. Only R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap) has been put on hold. Assuming that makes the other REPTN batches safe would be wrong — they're just untested.

Testing at APS is in total chaos right now. Where a COA leaves its suffix undefined — muddied by the fact that the first batch frequently has none — nobody can say what was actually tested.
Click to expand...
Right as I was getting ready to order — mind if I ask where you dig up that valuable information , knowledge is key
 
Hello beutiful said:

BrightCandle said:

Alc23 said:

APS has added R30 to the announcement (lavender cap). Don't touch it until more testing happens

Right now APS doesn't look good at all.
Click to expand...
The whole serial number narrative they've been telling has collapsed. Testing organised by batch number has come apart, since only the BPC-10 PYQI-A was pulled — anyone holding PYQI discovered theirs wasn't recalled. Yet for ages they insisted those suffixes (the -A part) were warehouse codes; they aren't, they're simply part of the serial number. It may carry meaning for their supplier, though what exactly is unclear, and from where we sit they are plainly different products that each need testing.

Every COA APS has ever issued has treated that suffix (-A -1) as if it didn't matter. Only R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap) has been put on hold. Assuming that makes the other REPTN batches safe would be wrong — they're just untested.

Testing at APS is in total chaos right now. Where a COA leaves its suffix undefined — muddied by the fact that the first batch frequently has none — nobody can say what was actually tested.
Click to expand...
Right as I was getting ready to order — mind if I ask where you dig up that valuable information , knowledge is key
Click to expand...
I sit in the 2 test groups on APS products where these problems turned up. The R30 and the BPC-10 — both failures are mine as well, and I'm a lot of $ out of pocket at this moment. Nearly all of it goes on over at STG and the APS Testing Community.
 
A batch of KPV came from them and I was told the results were still pending from Jano; after a few chases they owned up to never having run the testing, and by then the batch had changed, so there wasn't much point bothering.

Testing has so few people in it that buying again from GB worked out cheaper than testing it myself.
 
slowbro said:

Yikes, this batch is what I've been pinning for the past couple of weeks. Going at what I believed was 500mcg twice daily, and no results have shown up. Anybody know whether TB500 is actually in there, or if it's 5g of BPC and nothing more
Click to expand...
ive been watching it closely bc I was gonna buy, and my conclusion is that the batch (or some variants of it, going by the codes afterwards) ended up swapped out with Wolverine by mistake. Which leaves only two possibilities — pinning BPC-157 alone OR pinning Wolverine Blend. To me that doesn't make the product total bunk, though that is only my read after going through a lot of posts.
 
BrightCandle said:

Alc23 said:

APS has added R30 to the announcement (lavender cap). Don't touch it until more testing happens

Right now APS doesn't look good at all.
Click to expand...
The whole serial number narrative they've been telling has collapsed. Testing organised by batch number has come apart, since only the BPC-10 PYQI-A was pulled — anyone holding PYQI discovered theirs wasn't recalled. Yet for ages they insisted those suffixes (the -A part) were warehouse codes; they aren't, they're simply part of the serial number. It may carry meaning for their supplier, though what exactly is unclear, and from where we sit they are plainly different products that each need testing.

Every COA APS has ever issued has treated that suffix (-A -1) as if it didn't matter. Only R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap) has been put on hold. Assuming that makes the other REPTN batches safe would be wrong — they're just untested.

Testing at APS is in total chaos right now. Where a COA leaves its suffix undefined — muddied by the fact that the first batch frequently has none — nobody can say what was actually tested.
Click to expand...
Yes, trying to work out what's going on with the coding. I won't leap to bad conclusions straight away, though for COA purposes, knowing what those extra characters on the batch codes mean matters. My T30-A Batch PNPU-N2 — if N2 means a separate processor, Id like to know. PNPU N1 came back great
 
bamagirl26 said:

BrightCandle said:

Alc23 said:

APS has added R30 to the announcement (lavender cap). Don't touch it until more testing happens

Right now APS doesn't look good at all.
Click to expand...
The whole serial number narrative they've been telling has collapsed. Testing organised by batch number has come apart, since only the BPC-10 PYQI-A was pulled — anyone holding PYQI discovered theirs wasn't recalled. Yet for ages they insisted those suffixes (the -A part) were warehouse codes; they aren't, they're simply part of the serial number. It may carry meaning for their supplier, though what exactly is unclear, and from where we sit they are plainly different products that each need testing.

Every COA APS has ever issued has treated that suffix (-A -1) as if it didn't matter. Only R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap) has been put on hold. Assuming that makes the other REPTN batches safe would be wrong — they're just untested.

Testing at APS is in total chaos right now. Where a COA leaves its suffix undefined — muddied by the fact that the first batch frequently has none — nobody can say what was actually tested.
Click to expand...
Yes, trying to work out what's going on with the coding. I won't leap to bad conclusions straight away, though for COA purposes, knowing what those extra characters on the batch codes mean matters. My T30-A Batch PNPU-N2 — if N2 means a separate processor, Id like to know. PNPU N1 came back great
Click to expand...
That news is very welcome, seeing as it's one of my other items.
 
Back
Top