“No Source Discussion”?

randompersonrandom said:

v2boi said:

Often when I'm about to answer a thread, this nagging worry kicks in that others will read it as me just posting to rack up activity…

So I back out, shut the tab, and promise myself “next time.”

And look at me now, still stuck under “no source discussion” 🤣
well, congrats — seems like your "no source discussion" rule has just been lifted.
Oh my goodness, oh my goodness, oh my goodness!!!

This milestone deserves a shout-out to each and every one of you, and I hope your own version arrives very soon, not far down the road.

Alright, time to go talk sourcing—be right back.
 
My guess is that the rule exists so shills can’t waltz in and start promoting dealers. They want to see that you’re genuinely taking part and adding to the discussion, which shows you aren’t a scammer or a shill.

That’s only my guess, though.
 
When it gets removed, does a small alert pop up for you, or do you have to watch for it yourself? Just to be clear, I fully support this.
 
v2boi said:

randompersonrandom said:

v2boi said:

Often when I'm about to answer a thread, this nagging worry kicks in that others will read it as me just posting to rack up activity…

So I back out, shut the tab, and promise myself “next time.”

And look at me now, still stuck under “no source discussion” 🤣
well, congrats — seems like your "no source discussion" rule has just been lifted.
Oh my goodness, oh my goodness, oh my goodness!!!

This milestone deserves a shout-out to each and every one of you, and I hope your own version arrives very soon, not far down the road.

Alright, time to go talk sourcing—be right back.
How much time was needed for that? Nice work!!!!
 
I came on board around August of last year, and for the most part I simply browsed and picked things up. There’s already so much reliable material here that starting fresh threads rarely seemed necessary—usually a quick search gave me what I needed.

If I thought I had something worth sharing, I’d post a reply. When I didn’t have anything real to offer, I stayed in reading mode and dropped likes on the posts I came across.

My best guess is that simply showing up regularly, staying polite, and genuinely trying to bring something to the table over time is what did it. That’s really all there is to it.

And honestly, losing that tag doesn’t send me rushing off to talk about sources—it feels more like something was lifted off my shoulders 😆
 
Vash_ said:

My guess is that the rule exists so shills can’t waltz in and start promoting dealers. They want to see that you’re genuinely taking part and adding to the discussion, which shows you aren’t a scammer or a shill.

That’s only my guess, though.
If you actually go through the new member rules, that point is covered almost exactly in those same terms.
 
Teretere said:

Since I’m still fairly new here, this didn’t really get to me. That massive thread of recommended suppliers actually taught me a lot about how to judge a vendor in the first place. Mostly, though, I hung around the cat thread 🤣

Honestly, making people pause and go through all the great material on this site seems like a positive to me. When it comes to research peptides, getting the hang of proper research methods is a serious uphill climb as it is.
Wait, there’s a thread about cats?!
 
Graymaxxem said:

Teretere said:

Since I’m still fairly new here, this didn’t really get to me. That massive thread of recommended suppliers actually taught me a lot about how to judge a vendor in the first place. Mostly, though, I hung around the cat thread 🤣

Honestly, making people pause and go through all the great material on this site seems like a positive to me. When it comes to research peptides, getting the hang of proper research methods is a serious uphill climb as it is.
Wait, there’s a thread about cats?!
Isn't having a cat thread basically a must for existing online? Whether it's a forum or a social site and so on, without one you just can't be seen as legit!
 
Graymaxxem said:

Teretere said:

Since I’m still fairly new here, this didn’t really get to me. That massive thread of recommended suppliers actually taught me a lot about how to judge a vendor in the first place. Mostly, though, I hung around the cat thread 🤣

Honestly, making people pause and go through all the great material on this site seems like a positive to me. When it comes to research peptides, getting the hang of proper research methods is a serious uphill climb as it is.
Wait, there’s a thread about cats?!
Yep, that's a thing! Just type "cat thread" into the search bar and it should show up immediately. 🙂
 
Mara_aa said:

sa12uk said:

Just engage with threads, contribute something valuable — post count and likes likely carry a lot of weight in the algorithm. Basically, they want proof that you benefit the community before they lift your restrictions.
I’m really grateful that you took the time to help and walk me through this.

At this point, my main focus is reading and learning. Since this forum has a lot of people with deep knowledge, I’d rather watch and get a clearer understanding first, then become more involved later. When the moment is right, I hope to take part more and contribute something helpful based on what I’ve been through!
Hey Mara, glad you're here! I've been dropping in and out since Oct '24... and honestly, when it comes to specifics about certain methods, supplies and suppliers, I still feel like a beginner. When I first arrived I was using compounds, then I picked up solid leads on suppliers from China, and these days I've landed on a U.S. website that costs more but gives me the ease of simple ordering, testing already done and credit card... and it still beats compound or government sponsered RX by a mile. I've got enough put away for 5 years, and I'm now at a weight for maintenance, but I'm always on the lookout for new ideas and curious about the latest buzz. Stick with the forum. It has so much to offer.
 
Vash_ said:

My guess is that the rule exists so shills can’t waltz in and start promoting dealers. They want to see that you’re genuinely taking part and adding to the discussion, which shows you aren’t a scammer or a shill.

That’s only my guess, though.
Most likely that's precisely it.
 
randompersonrandom said:

Alikron13 said:

Not sure if this is an appropriate thing to ask — if it isn’t, I’ve got no issue with whichever mod looks at it simply removing the post. That said, since this thread seems to have a decent amount of newer users asking questions, I thought it was worth trying:

Does anyone know when DMs become available? Or am I just too dense to work out how to unlock them... LOL I realize that may sound like an odd thing to ask, but I’d really like to get into a testing group, and from what I can tell that means DMs have to be sent, so I thought I’d ask. I’m fine with waiting patiently — I just wanted to find out whether I was missing something, and I didn’t want to spend way too long waiting before asking about something I could have taken care of if I only had the brain cells to figure it out 🤣

Mara_aa said:

Alikron13 said:

Not sure if this is an appropriate thing to ask — if it isn’t, I’ve got no issue with whichever mod looks at it simply removing the post. That said, since this thread seems to have a decent amount of newer users asking questions, I thought it was worth trying:

Does anyone know when DMs become available? Or am I just too dense to work out how to unlock them... LOL I realize that may sound like an odd thing to ask, but I’d really like to get into a testing group, and from what I can tell that means DMs have to be sent, so I thought I’d ask. I’m fine with waiting patiently — I just wanted to find out whether I was missing something, and I didn’t want to spend way too long waiting before asking about something I could have taken care of if I only had the brain cells to figure it out 🤣

With respect, may I add my own name to this ask. Taking part in a rigorous group test, and doing it the right way, is something I would sincerely value. The messaging limits are clear to me and I accept them, yet when private contact isn’t an option, cases like this become hard to handle. Should there be any room for that to be looked at, I would be very grateful. Thanks for everything you put into moderating this community.

So the people running this place intentionally keep those details private, and there's a solid rationale behind it. Suppose you were running a scam, shilling for someone, acting as a fanboy, or filling that "social media manager" role Finricks was putting out an ad for — and suppose it were simple to figure out "Oh, alright, so it's elapsed time since signup, multiplied by post count, divided by likes received, with "wow" reactions subtracting five, plus 3 per reply-to" — then gaming the system would be trivially fast. You could pay lip service to the requirements just long enough to unlock DM-ing every person you spot leaving a foolish or naive comment, and then cash in.

If instead you simply keep posting, hand out likes when something genuinely deserves one to you, and contribute remarks interesting enough to earn the occasional like, the wait isn't that long. And chances are you're better off not purchasing peps during that stretch regardless, since you probably don't yet have a full picture of all the fuckery in this sphere — meaning you'd just end up scammed, charged way too much, or handed garbage product either way.
That's a pretty concise way to put it.
 
randompersonrandom said:

Graymaxxem said:

Teretere said:

Since I’m still fairly new here, this didn’t really get to me. That massive thread of recommended suppliers actually taught me a lot about how to judge a vendor in the first place. Mostly, though, I hung around the cat thread 🤣

Honestly, making people pause and go through all the great material on this site seems like a positive to me. When it comes to research peptides, getting the hang of proper research methods is a serious uphill climb as it is.
Wait, there’s a thread about cats?!
Yep, that's a thing! Just type "cat thread" into the search bar and it should show up immediately. 🙂
I caved and looked it up anyway. 🤣
 
randompersonrandom said:

v2boi said:

Often when I'm about to answer a thread, this nagging worry kicks in that others will read it as me just posting to rack up activity…

So I back out, shut the tab, and promise myself “next time.”

And look at me now, still stuck under “no source discussion” 🤣
well, congrats — seems like your "no source discussion" rule has just been lifted.
so I am "totally" not congratulating you here, purely so my " no source discussion" tag gets pulled. /s 🙂
 
Jerrey said:

Graymaxxem said:

Teretere said:

Since I’m still fairly new here, this didn’t really get to me. That massive thread of recommended suppliers actually taught me a lot about how to judge a vendor in the first place. Mostly, though, I hung around the cat thread 🤣

Honestly, making people pause and go through all the great material on this site seems like a positive to me. When it comes to research peptides, getting the hang of proper research methods is a serious uphill climb as it is.
Wait, there’s a thread about cats?!
Isn't having a cat thread basically a must for existing online? Whether it's a forum or a social site and so on, without one you just can't be seen as legit!
who exactly are you trying to flatter???
 
skeptick said:

Jerrey said:

Graymaxxem said:

Teretere said:

Since I’m still fairly new here, this didn’t really get to me. That massive thread of recommended suppliers actually taught me a lot about how to judge a vendor in the first place. Mostly, though, I hung around the cat thread 🤣

Honestly, making people pause and go through all the great material on this site seems like a positive to me. When it comes to research peptides, getting the hang of proper research methods is a serious uphill climb as it is.
Wait, there’s a thread about cats?!
Isn't having a cat thread basically a must for existing online? Whether it's a forum or a social site and so on, without one you just can't be seen as legit!
who exactly are you trying to flatter???
Why my roommate Mr. Boots of course.
 
Vash_ said:

My guess is that the rule exists so shills can’t waltz in and start promoting dealers. They want to see that you’re genuinely taking part and adding to the discussion, which shows you aren’t a scammer or a shill.

That’s only my guess, though.
Honestly...nobody has ever approached me about shilling for them. Why is that? What makes me not shill material? Not a single person has given me cash to shill, or goods to shill...nothing at all, zero.

It kind of feels like an opportunity slipped past me...a post-retirement second career, being a "Shill".

And how would that even appear on a resume? So what have you been up to these past two years?

Shilling. I shill professionally! 😉
 
FarmgirlRebel said:

Vash_ said:

My guess is that the rule exists so shills can’t waltz in and start promoting dealers. They want to see that you’re genuinely taking part and adding to the discussion, which shows you aren’t a scammer or a shill.

That’s only my guess, though.
Honestly...nobody has ever approached me about shilling for them. Why is that? What makes me not shill material? Not a single person has given me cash to shill, or goods to shill...nothing at all, zero.

It kind of feels like an opportunity slipped past me...a post-retirement second career, being a "Shill".

And how would that even appear on a resume? So what have you been up to these past two years?

Shilling. I shill professionally! 😉

Cricket Wireless gets a bit of promotion from me. No money changes hands, and they have no idea I do it. I signed up with them just after my second marriage ended. The price is low, and across 20 years I have not run into any issues.
 
randompersonrandom said:

FarmgirlRebel said:

Vash_ said:

My guess is that the rule exists so shills can’t waltz in and start promoting dealers. They want to see that you’re genuinely taking part and adding to the discussion, which shows you aren’t a scammer or a shill.

That’s only my guess, though.
Honestly...nobody has ever approached me about shilling for them. Why is that? What makes me not shill material? Not a single person has given me cash to shill, or goods to shill...nothing at all, zero.

It kind of feels like an opportunity slipped past me...a post-retirement second career, being a "Shill".

And how would that even appear on a resume? So what have you been up to these past two years?

Shilling. I shill professionally! 😉

Cricket Wireless gets a bit of promotion from me. No money changes hands, and they have no idea I do it. I signed up with them just after my second marriage ended. The price is low, and across 20 years I have not run into any issues.
Handing it out at no cost? What a stingy promoter! 😆
 
FarmgirlRebel said:

randompersonrandom said:

FarmgirlRebel said:

Vash_ said:

My guess is that the rule exists so shills can’t waltz in and start promoting dealers. They want to see that you’re genuinely taking part and adding to the discussion, which shows you aren’t a scammer or a shill.

That’s only my guess, though.
Honestly...nobody has ever approached me about shilling for them. Why is that? What makes me not shill material? Not a single person has given me cash to shill, or goods to shill...nothing at all, zero.

It kind of feels like an opportunity slipped past me...a post-retirement second career, being a "Shill".

And how would that even appear on a resume? So what have you been up to these past two years?

Shilling. I shill professionally! 😉

Cricket Wireless gets a bit of promotion from me. No money changes hands, and they have no idea I do it. I signed up with them just after my second marriage ended. The price is low, and across 20 years I have not run into any issues.
Handing it out at no cost? What a stingy promoter! 😆
Choosing me for my mobile carrier. I'm different from the rest, I'm on Cricket phones.
 
Back
Top