Why Not CJC-1295 DAC

wildweasel

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2026
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Location
Imported archive
CJC no DAC users, why do you choose it over CJC-DAC?

CJC no DAC seems to be preferred by almost everyone in the peptide community over CJC-DAC and I’ve always found this curious given CJC-DAC has so much medical literature showing significant increases to average gh increases by 200%-1000% and igf-1 increases by 150%-300% above baseline… and only requires weekly dosing instead of 2-3 times daily…. You don’t event need to pair it with a ghrp like ipamorelin to get its effects.

Just wondering your thoughts and why you chose what you did
 
wildweasel said:


CJC-DAC has so much medical literature showing significant increases to average gh increases by 200%-1000% and igf-1 increases by 150%-300% above baseline… and only requires weekly dosing instead of 2-3 times daily

Click to expand...
You answered your question. Thats why folks dont take it. Normally, in our bodies, GH works in intermittent pulse release. Consistent and permanent release of GH is at best artificial, and at worst, excessive. So, with a secretogoblin constantly pushing the pituitary gland to produce somatotropin, there is a chance for excess GH. I think that's why it is not recommended unless folks have a severely low GH or IGF production.
 
Back
Top