5byfive said:
If you're looking at this through a biohacking lens, Tirz is far more logical than Reta. Tirz appears to offer advantages that aren't tied to losing weight, whereas so far Reta hasn't demonstrated those same advantages. When taken at low doses, Tirz also appears to act in a different way compared to Reta. Reta seems to hit the GLP and GIP receptors less, and clearly those receptors are what Tirz goes after. On top of that, Reta puts more strain on the body.
As far as dosing goes, .2mg doing anything meaningful is a stretch. Every benefit that's been observed came at doses that were much higher, and even then, once you account for weight loss, those benefits appear to persist but probably aren't very big. It's all speculation, but something like at least 1mg looks like a sensible threshold where benefits might show up.