Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What explains the placebo arm climbing from 2% all the way to 19%??FarmgirlRebel said:
Interesting.
At 80 weeks, 4mg and 12mg show a clear gap in weight loss.
Yet when you look ahead to 104 weeks, those gaps become largely negligible, particularly when comparing 4mg with 9mg.
The chart and study design show that every participant increased their reta dose gradually until reaching the highest dose they could tolerate, during weeks 80 through 104.PinKushn said:
What explains the placebo arm climbing from 2% all the way to 19%??FarmgirlRebel said:
Interesting.
At 80 weeks, 4mg and 12mg show a clear gap in weight loss.
Yet when you look ahead to 104 weeks, those gaps become largely negligible, particularly when comparing 4mg with 9mg.
PinKushn said:
What explains the placebo arm climbing from 2% all the way to 19%??FarmgirlRebel said:
Interesting.
At 80 weeks, 4mg and 12mg show a clear gap in weight loss.
Yet when you look ahead to 104 weeks, those gaps become largely negligible, particularly when comparing 4mg with 9mg.
The poster and I are in the same boat. Over 8 months, I dropped 27.5%. Those final 12 lbs required 2 months to come off. When you're near the end, your set point puts up a serious fight against further loss.
m100568 said:
View attachment 24119
Click to expand...
I'm really curious whether the placebo they used included some kind of MEGA-LAXATIVE
They have more to kill/mybodyisasewer said:
This is a matter of national security.
The US DoD has to ensure gen Z gets access to this stuff so they can meet fitness standards for service.
The CCP is the one selling us the drugs that would strengthen the draft pool of their opponent.
Somehow the US seems fine letting its kids stay fat, while the Chinese are fine making them fit.
That's what puzzles the patriot.
Grogu said:
One more MASSIVE point from the phase 3 top line data: even when the dose increase happened at week 80, continuing to titrate upward still yielded extra weight reduction through week 104 (2 years). Absolutely YEAH! As expected, this effect was stronger among the 4mg group than the 9mg group. Still, for those on 9mg, going up at week 80 through week 104 gave close to another 3.4% of loss.
25MG of Tirzepatide, coming through, make some room. Right now, I would happily accept an extra 3.4% of weight loss….
Smiter said:
They have more to kill/mybodyisasewer said:
This is a matter of national security.
The US DoD has to ensure gen Z gets access to this stuff so they can meet fitness standards for service.
The CCP is the one selling us the drugs that would strengthen the draft pool of their opponent.
Somehow the US seems fine letting its kids stay fat, while the Chinese are fine making them fit.
That's what puzzles the patriot.
Grogu said:
One more MASSIVE point from the phase 3 top line data: even when the dose increase happened at week 80, continuing to titrate upward still yielded extra weight reduction through week 104 (2 years). Absolutely YEAH! As expected, this effect was stronger among the 4mg group than the 9mg group. Still, for those on 9mg, going up at week 80 through week 104 gave close to another 3.4% of loss.
25MG of Tirzepatide, coming through, make some room. Right now, I would happily accept an extra 3.4% of weight loss….
![]()
![]()
still, the placebo details look very sketchy to me.
Sounds less like despair and more like they swiped a stash of Reta vials and launched into a stabbing rampage.Grogu said:
Smiter said:
They have more to kill/mybodyisasewer said:
This is a matter of national security.
The US DoD has to ensure gen Z gets access to this stuff so they can meet fitness standards for service.
The CCP is the one selling us the drugs that would strengthen the draft pool of their opponent.
Somehow the US seems fine letting its kids stay fat, while the Chinese are fine making them fit.
That's what puzzles the patriot.
Grogu said:
One more MASSIVE point from the phase 3 top line data: even when the dose increase happened at week 80, continuing to titrate upward still yielded extra weight reduction through week 104 (2 years). Absolutely YEAH! As expected, this effect was stronger among the 4mg group than the 9mg group. Still, for those on 9mg, going up at week 80 through week 104 gave close to another 3.4% of loss.
25MG of Tirzepatide, coming through, make some room. Right now, I would happily accept an extra 3.4% of weight loss….
![]()
![]()
still, the placebo details look very sketchy to me.
True, a 17% drop across 24 weeks does look quite striking. Still, once week 80 rolled around, those folks were so frantic about dropping pounds that they basically launched a hunger strike.
Smiter said:
They have more to kill/mybodyisasewer said:
This is a matter of national security.
The US DoD has to ensure gen Z gets access to this stuff so they can meet fitness standards for service.
The CCP is the one selling us the drugs that would strengthen the draft pool of their opponent.
Somehow the US seems fine letting its kids stay fat, while the Chinese are fine making them fit.
That's what puzzles the patriot.
Grogu said:
One more MASSIVE point from the phase 3 top line data: even when the dose increase happened at week 80, continuing to titrate upward still yielded extra weight reduction through week 104 (2 years). Absolutely YEAH! As expected, this effect was stronger among the 4mg group than the 9mg group. Still, for those on 9mg, going up at week 80 through week 104 gave close to another 3.4% of loss.
25MG of Tirzepatide, coming through, make some room. Right now, I would happily accept an extra 3.4% of weight loss….
![]()
![]()
still, the placebo details look very sketchy to me.
Yeah, I get it...strange. The placebo response is definitely genuine.PinKushn said:
What explains the placebo arm climbing from 2% all the way to 19%??FarmgirlRebel said:
Interesting.
At 80 weeks, 4mg and 12mg show a clear gap in weight loss.
Yet when you look ahead to 104 weeks, those gaps become largely negligible, particularly when comparing 4mg with 9mg.
That's the reason the study methods struck me as questionable. If they actually received the genuine medication, what justifies labeling them a placebo group? And on top of that, a few suggest they got the drug afterward and then experienced massive weight reduction...To me, all of that looked wrong.woundcarping said:
Smiter said:
They have more to kill/mybodyisasewer said:
This is a matter of national security.
The US DoD has to ensure gen Z gets access to this stuff so they can meet fitness standards for service.
The CCP is the one selling us the drugs that would strengthen the draft pool of their opponent.
Somehow the US seems fine letting its kids stay fat, while the Chinese are fine making them fit.
That's what puzzles the patriot.
Grogu said:
One more MASSIVE point from the phase 3 top line data: even when the dose increase happened at week 80, continuing to titrate upward still yielded extra weight reduction through week 104 (2 years). Absolutely YEAH! As expected, this effect was stronger among the 4mg group than the 9mg group. Still, for those on 9mg, going up at week 80 through week 104 gave close to another 3.4% of loss.
25MG of Tirzepatide, coming through, make some room. Right now, I would happily accept an extra 3.4% of weight loss….
![]()
![]()
still, the placebo details look very sketchy to me.
Are you aware that the placebo arm was switched to Reta at the 80-week mark, which led to weight loss in those participants?
In a separate trial, didn’t the 12mg cohort achieve a 24% reduction over 48 weeks?
The control group is the placebo group… until the test variable is introduced, every participant belongs to the control group… Those who began receiving Reta at 80 weeks had been part of the control group up to that point. Think of it as back-to-back trials, where the control groups for the placebo and the lower dose escalation trials run at the same time.Smiter said:
That's the reason the study methods struck me as questionable. If they actually received the genuine medication, what justifies labeling them a placebo group? And on top of that, a few suggest they got the drug afterward and then experienced massive weight reduction...To me, all of that looked wrong.woundcarping said:
Smiter said:
They have more to kill/mybodyisasewer said:
This is a matter of national security.
The US DoD has to ensure gen Z gets access to this stuff so they can meet fitness standards for service.
The CCP is the one selling us the drugs that would strengthen the draft pool of their opponent.
Somehow the US seems fine letting its kids stay fat, while the Chinese are fine making them fit.
That's what puzzles the patriot.
Grogu said:
One more MASSIVE point from the phase 3 top line data: even when the dose increase happened at week 80, continuing to titrate upward still yielded extra weight reduction through week 104 (2 years). Absolutely YEAH! As expected, this effect was stronger among the 4mg group than the 9mg group. Still, for those on 9mg, going up at week 80 through week 104 gave close to another 3.4% of loss.
25MG of Tirzepatide, coming through, make some room. Right now, I would happily accept an extra 3.4% of weight loss….
![]()
![]()
still, the placebo details look very sketchy to me.
Are you aware that the placebo arm was switched to Reta at the 80-week mark, which led to weight loss in those participants?
In a separate trial, didn’t the 12mg cohort achieve a 24% reduction over 48 weeks?