Peptide Seller Ads That Look Terrible

yaggemr

yaggemr

Explorer
Joined
Jul 31, 2026
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
Hey, has anyone else come across AI-generated ads in the peptide world that look especially awful? I have to say, a few I’ve seen are seriously cringeworthy. I’d love to hear about the cringe, but please don’t mention any Sources.😂
 
Those sorts of advertisements—I can't figure out which audience they're meant to attract, but they definitely don't do it for me....woof!
 
yaggemr said:

Hey, has anyone else come across AI-generated ads in the peptide world that look especially awful? I have to say, a few I’ve seen are seriously cringeworthy. I’d love to hear about the cringe, but please don’t mention any Sources.😂
Click to expand...
This is a genuinely entertaining topic concept, and I'm on board with it — but the red "No source discussion" banner on your profile makes it tricky, since going into specifics would mean naming particular sellers.

I'm not certain how much ground we're actually allowed to cover here.

If the meaning of "No source discussion" is unclear to you or to anyone else, there's an older thread that lays out pretty much every angle people have raised on the subject.




How do I get rid of the 'no source discussion' next to my name?



As far as I can recall, that label wasn't present when I signed up, and I have no memory of putting it there myself. What's the way to remove it?

051f0e2f5b7f6ffbb4a2f10b404546ba44b6197464dfbacec1b043fb189c69a3.png



GLP1Chat.com
 
What gets me is when TT is used by kids to promote stuff while they're in their vehicle, or those jacked dudes lounging on a sofa barely dressed
 
So there's no option for us not to call out specific people or send in picks? What a disappointingly polite setup. 😆
 
Just A Cat said:

So there's no option for us not to call out specific people or send in picks? What a disappointingly polite setup. 😆
Click to expand...
At this point they're about as widespread as our lovely Dear models...
 
Vriende said:


I love this fun idea for a topic, but unfortunately with your red “No source discussion” banner, it is hard to get into detail without bringing up certain vendors.

Not sure how far we can venture here.

For you or others flummoxed by what “No source discussion” means, here is an old thread where just about every possible perspective was brought up.




How do I get rid of the 'no source discussion' next to my name?



I'm pretty sure that wasn't there when I joined and I don't remember adding it. How do I take it down?

favicon-32x32.png



glp1forum.com

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I hadn't considered that the question might be a way to sidestep the restriction. Nice observation.
 

Attachments

  • 051f0e2f5b7f6ffbb4a2f10b404546ba44b6197464dfbacec1b043fb189c69a3.png
    051f0e2f5b7f6ffbb4a2f10b404546ba44b6197464dfbacec1b043fb189c69a3.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 13
Glowing neon colors, claims of 99.9% purity, and deals like buy 2 at an absurdly inflated price and get 1 free—on and on it goes.
 
It's wild that this community has such a strong fondness for AI-made artwork. That's a generational divide. Most GenZ and Gen Alpha folks appear to recognize it for what it is, millennials tend to fall on both sides, yet GenX and boomers are completely enamored with AI.
 
birdwhacker said:

It's wild that this community has such a strong fondness for AI-made artwork. That's a generational divide. Most GenZ and Gen Alpha folks appear to recognize it for what it is, millennials tend to fall on both sides, yet GenX and boomers are completely enamored with AI.
Click to expand...

Speaking as someone from GenX: honestly, there isn't much we're fond of at all..

As for the A versus Z dispute, though:

Recent studies confirm that younger generations strongly dislike and push back against AI-generated marketing and advertising. [1, 2]

What the Research Shows

    • Negative Reactions: A study by Rival Technologies revealed that 74% of Gen Z consumers react negatively when they realize a brand's marketing was made with AI. [1]
    • Brand Punishment: Nearly three in four (72%) Gen Z respondents have taken direct punitive action against a brand for using AI marketing, such as unfollowing them on social media, unsubscribing from texts/emails, or stopping purchases altogether. [1]
    • Authenticity Gap: Data from the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) shows a wide disconnect: while advertisers often assume young consumers feel positive about AI ads, 39% of Gen Z report a negative sentiment toward them, viewing AI ads as inauthentic or unethical. [1, 2]
    • Broader Skepticism: According to a Bentley University-Gallup poll, younger adults (ages 18 to 29) are consistently the demographic most likely to view a business using AI for advertisements in a negative light

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
HereKittyKitty said:


Hadn't thought about the question as making an end run around the restriction.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I didn't read that as an attempt to go around the rules, but from what I remember, Zippity has requested that we avoid any vendor mentions when there are people with a "No source discussion" stance and many newcomers might not get why that limit exists.

As of now the thread appears to be staying intact, though it would be a lot more entertaining to actually look at examples of those awful ads! 😂
 
Vriende said:


I did not take it as an end run, but IIRC Zippity has asked us to not engage in any vendor mentions with no “No source discussion” folks and lots of newer folks may not understand the restriction.

So far the thread seems to be holding up, but it would be way more fun to see samples of the atrocious ads! 😂

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
A whole section is packed with those. No point in promoting them anywhere else, not even for a "laugh"
 
Flash-BCR said:


Boomers have entered the chat....we don't even like GenX'rs not liking anything...We 'own' get off my lawn levels of dislike...😳 😎 😎

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I'm right on the edge of being a boomer — by 2 years I didn't make it. My dad was silent generation, though, and my brother is a boomer.

So basically nothing bothers me.. unless it's cars sitting on my lawn..

Last week I ran off 2 of them.
 
Skidude said:


I am borderline boomer, missed by 2 years.. but Father was silent and brother boomer..

So I don't give a shit about anything.. except cars on my lawn..

Chased 2 away last week.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Switching over to a complete boomer-grade aversion will go smoothly for you... BNLFL and I are available to run seminars... 👍 😎
 
As someone else from the boomer generation, AI isn't something I like, and I have no desire to be
 
HereKittyKitty said:


Hadn't thought about the question as making an end run around the restriction. Good catch.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Using this post to get around talking about sources wasn't what I meant to do. I just kept noticing super cheesy AI art and figured it was worth mentioning. Sorry if that's a problem. I get where the conflict is, but that wasn't my goal. My thinking was folks could share examples without directly naming a source, though I should probably have put that in the original post. I've now edited it to say no sources.✌️
 
Back
Top