Peptide Science Explained on a Great YouTube Channel

[CurlySlacker42]

Hey everyone. For anyone looking for peptides information that sticks to science and facts without the hype, there's a YouTube channel called Bioavailable that covers peptides along with new therapies you might find useful. Hopefully this helps you all out.

 

[eidos]

A solid presentation at university level. It consolidates everything into a single spot. You won’t need to hunt for details spread across Pep Pedia, blogs, and wikis. The organization isn’t great and it definitely isn’t taught in a pedagogical manner. Each person learns differently: check it out and decide if it suits you.

 

[laansasa]

That video and channel are really fascinating! I appreciate you posting it!

 

[ColdSmoke]

I really enjoy finding a fresh YouTube source—thanks for sharing!

 

[CurlySlacker42]

laansasa said:

That video and channel are really fascinating! I appreciate you posting it!

Glad it helped !

 

[CurlySlacker42]

eidos said:

A solid presentation at university level. It consolidates everything into a single spot. You won’t need to hunt for details spread across Pep Pedia, blogs, and wikis. The organization isn’t great and it definitely isn’t taught in a pedagogical manner. Each person learns differently: check it out and decide if it suits you.

You don't think it's presented in a way that teaches? What exactly are you getting at?

 

[eidos]

CurlySlacker42 said:

eidos said:

A solid presentation at university level. It consolidates everything into a single spot. You won’t need to hunt for details spread across Pep Pedia, blogs, and wikis. The organization isn’t great and it definitely isn’t taught in a pedagogical manner. Each person learns differently: check it out and decide if it suits you.

You don't think it's presented in a way that teaches? What exactly are you getting at?

Put briefly:

"A well-structured mind, rather than a well-filled memory."

Merely enumerating facts, even if you point out what information was derived from them, seldom suffices to create understanding and apply it.

This idea traces back in part to R. Ackoff's work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIKW_pyramid

I won't attempt a thorough explanation here, since I can't do it in under 2 hours, and it drifts somewhat from the topic.

A useful practice is to examine how YouTube videos are put together: whether the presenter is a medical doctor, an academic, a DC or a gym instructor, the material is not delivered the same way. A peptide's usefulness, how to use it, methods, or limitations are not always covered, or not in a manner accessible to someone without a college-level science degree. Some speakers emphasize style more, others substance...

You can apply the 5 Ws and 1 H to sift through what is said. What is present and what is absent become clear.

 

[frankpeptid]

Useful content. I hit subscribe. Appreciate the heads-up.

 

[Shittersfull]

Appreciate it. Solid channel. In my view, most YouTube channels are pushing products. This one comes across as more educational.

 

[CurlySlacker42]

eidos said:

CurlySlacker42 said:

eidos said:

A solid presentation at university level. It consolidates everything into a single spot. You won’t need to hunt for details spread across Pep Pedia, blogs, and wikis. The organization isn’t great and it definitely isn’t taught in a pedagogical manner. Each person learns differently: check it out and decide if it suits you.

You don't think it's presented in a way that teaches? What exactly are you getting at?

Put briefly:

"A well-structured mind, rather than a well-filled memory."

Merely enumerating facts, even if you point out what information was derived from them, seldom suffices to create understanding and apply it.

This idea traces back in part to R. Ackoff's work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIKW_pyramid

I won't attempt a thorough explanation here, since I can't do it in under 2 hours, and it drifts somewhat from the topic.

A useful practice is to examine how YouTube videos are put together: whether the presenter is a medical doctor, an academic, a DC or a gym instructor, the material is not delivered the same way. A peptide's usefulness, how to use it, methods, or limitations are not always covered, or not in a manner accessible to someone without a college-level science degree. Some speakers emphasize style more, others substance...

You can apply the 5 Ws and 1 H to sift through what is said. What is present and what is absent become clear.

So you'd rather see informational videos delivered in a way that someone without a science background can follow?

 

[oldrunnerguy]

"Docs who lift" put out an episode on peptides. Which side of the fence they reside on—I'll let you guess.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EUOkQPcM_0

 

[eidos]

CurlySlacker42 said:

eidos said:

CurlySlacker42 said:

eidos said:

A solid presentation at university level. It consolidates everything into a single spot. You won’t need to hunt for details spread across Pep Pedia, blogs, and wikis. The organization isn’t great and it definitely isn’t taught in a pedagogical manner. Each person learns differently: check it out and decide if it suits you.

You don't think it's presented in a way that teaches? What exactly are you getting at?

Put briefly:

"A well-structured mind, rather than a well-filled memory."

Merely enumerating facts, even if you point out what information was derived from them, seldom suffices to create understanding and apply it.

This idea traces back in part to R. Ackoff's work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIKW_pyramid

I won't attempt a thorough explanation here, since I can't do it in under 2 hours, and it drifts somewhat from the topic.

A useful practice is to examine how YouTube videos are put together: whether the presenter is a medical doctor, an academic, a DC or a gym instructor, the material is not delivered the same way. A peptide's usefulness, how to use it, methods, or limitations are not always covered, or not in a manner accessible to someone without a college-level science degree. Some speakers emphasize style more, others substance...

You can apply the 5 Ws and 1 H to sift through what is said. What is present and what is absent become clear.

So you'd rather see informational videos delivered in a way that someone without a science background can follow?

Nope, that doesn't matter to me. What bothers me is that I don't share your view of it as “excellent.” It's put together fairly well, but it falls short, and much of what's included doesn't serve much purpose.

 

[CurlySlacker42]

eidos said:

CurlySlacker42 said:

eidos said:

CurlySlacker42 said:

eidos said:

A solid presentation at university level. It consolidates everything into a single spot. You won’t need to hunt for details spread across Pep Pedia, blogs, and wikis. The organization isn’t great and it definitely isn’t taught in a pedagogical manner. Each person learns differently: check it out and decide if it suits you.

You don't think it's presented in a way that teaches? What exactly are you getting at?

Put briefly:

"A well-structured mind, rather than a well-filled memory."

Merely enumerating facts, even if you point out what information was derived from them, seldom suffices to create understanding and apply it.

This idea traces back in part to R. Ackoff's work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIKW_pyramid

I won't attempt a thorough explanation here, since I can't do it in under 2 hours, and it drifts somewhat from the topic.

A useful practice is to examine how YouTube videos are put together: whether the presenter is a medical doctor, an academic, a DC or a gym instructor, the material is not delivered the same way. A peptide's usefulness, how to use it, methods, or limitations are not always covered, or not in a manner accessible to someone without a college-level science degree. Some speakers emphasize style more, others substance...

You can apply the 5 Ws and 1 H to sift through what is said. What is present and what is absent become clear.

So you'd rather see informational videos delivered in a way that someone without a science background can follow?

Nope, that doesn't matter to me. What bothers me is that I don't share your view of it as “excellent.” It's put together fairly well, but it falls short, and much of what's included doesn't serve much purpose.

Alright, maybe it doesn't do anything for you. Let me be clear: what counts as excellent to me clearly isn't what counts as excellent to you. And that's perfectly okay.