Pentadeca-Arginate PDA vs BPC-157

Reviving this topic because I am also interested, particularly in the oral form since it's supposed to be more bioavailable than the unmodified BPC.
 
yeddie said:


Reviving this topic because I am also interested, particularly in the oral form since it's supposed to be more bioavailable than the unmodified BPC.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Apparently we are in a club of our own on this!
 
I tried it through compounding. Couldn’t tell any difference between it and BPC. The way it was explained to me is it’s almost identical to BPC but with an extra arginine attached to make it technically a different compound and skirt regulations.
 
Tron Carter said:


I tried it through compounding. Couldn’t tell any difference between it and BPC. The way it was explained to me is it’s almost identical to BPC but with an extra arginine attached to make it technically a different compound and skirt regulations.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I read it was for stability
 
Here's a podcast interview of Craig Koniver talking about his practice switching from BPC to PDA. It does appear to be a work-around for the FDA change of status for BPC. In another interview he did say that oral availability of PDA was better than BPC.
 
Bringing this back up.

I recently had PDA Pentadeca Arginate brought up in conversation and had never heard of it, so I started doing a little digging. I quickly found the correlation between BPC-157 and PDA. In the conversation I had I was given a link to a sports research site claiming that PDA was a superior peptide formulation to BPC-157, stating superior stability, and superior bioavailability.

If this is a truly superior version of BPC-157, and considering the immense use and popularity of BPC-157, why is PDA not a pep I’ve ever seen listed on any of the vendor lists? Why isn’t it booming with popularity? Anyone have a source?

Also, am I right to infer that this is another one of those situations where the injectable efficacy is less studied than the oral efficacy, and that we are just anecdotally assuming its effectiveness?
 
Back
Top