kugelblitz
Explorer
That is completely backwards. If you keep your mouth shut, and if they have nothing else on you, then the simple fact that a package showed up in your mailbox means nothing at all.Fabulous_Jackal said:
So the core problem you're facing isn't whether you can dodge KYC (Know your Customer) when buying crypto entirely. Picture this: you've got yourself a 'securely anonymous' wallet, and you've gone through the hassle of locating some random person willing to send crypto straight to your wallet in return for cash or another form of collateral. Even then, your address or delivery location remains your biggest vulnerability, and it always WILL be. Getting a package reliably without revealing something about yourself is basically impossible - a p.o box still carries the KYC problem, and any kind of postal 'service' that forwards deliveries runs into the same wall (plus every one of those layers adds complexity and drives up the cost). Sure, if you run a business with a business address that has plenty of employees, you could have the package sent there, and it turns into a genuine headache for anyone trying to prove it was meant for you. But again, if the products carry a name nobody recognizes, whoever handles the deliveries will either send it back to the sender or it eventually becomes a problem anyway, because packages keep arriving without your name on them, which by itself looks suspicious. If you're having things sent to your own address, even under a different name, it won't take the vendor OR anyone else who gets hold of that information long to work out who you actually are, provided they're willing to put in a bit of effort. So even with wallet mixing and crypto obfuscation, your $$$ is mostly protected, but your identity really isn't, nor is the whole "Let's narrow it down to x number of people"
Were it enough for prosecution that your name appeared on a parcel, then I could mail you controlled substances, call the police myself, and you would end up behind bars. This holds true even in cases where you sign for the parcel, and even in cases where you are captured on camera or otherwise recorded accepting it.
Unsolicited packages arrive at people's doors constantly. There's a con for it, known as brushing. Anyone who knows where to look can find your name, address, phone number, and email online, spread across more data breaches than anyone can count. Absent anything else on you, and assuming you don't talk to the cops, any lawyer with 2 functioning brain cells can get a case like that thrown out without much effort.
The worst that typically happens is your package gets seized and you receive a so-called love letter, which is just an attempt to frighten you into quitting, since that's the extent of what they can do without other evidence. Receiving a package only becomes genuinely dangerous in 2 scenarios: you've walked into a honeypot, or the dealer has been flipped, in which case they hold his records on you plus proof that you placed the order; the moment you take possession, boom, you're now in possession.
That's exactly where OPSEC and crypto matter. If you play your cards right, then even in the event the cops search your belongings, if they cannot prove you paid, cannot prove you ordered, and get nothing out of you, all they have is the fact that somebody, for whatever reason, mailed you drugs.