New Worry Around Obesity Medications: When the Pounds Come Off Too Quickly

Good-Heart6425

Explorer
Joined
Jul 31, 2025
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Location
San Francisco, ca
e2685cff863ef983cc919a27e7295cc87bd072ae617261f9f7caf4e636b6b16d.jpg




A New Concern About Weight Loss Drugs: What if They Work Too Well?



Some patients in a clinical trial of one new drug lost so much weight that they became concerned and dropped out.

94de5ae7e9bcf74727f45bb30ae37f553db4594012e2704336da5fbbf3357c3e.png



www.nytimes.com

A New Concern About Weight Loss Drugs: What if They Work Too Well?​#-a-new-concern-about-weight-loss-drugs-what-if-they-work-too-wellSome patients in a clinical trial of one new drug lost so much weight that they became concerned and dropped out.

By Dani Blum

Feb. 18, 2026

Leer en español

For years, scientists pushed to create medications capable of shedding as many pounds as possible. These days, the industry is easing off the gas.

According to recent top-line results from a trial of retatrutide — a compound under development at Eli Lilly — patients who had obesity along with knee osteoarthritis shed 28.7 percent of their body weight on average, measured after 68 weeks at the highest dose. By comparison, weight-loss drugs presently on the market have produced roughly 20 percent body weight reduction across that same span.

Side effects drove somewhere between 12 and 18 percent of trial participants to quit — a share larger than what is usually seen in studies of existing weight-loss drugs. At least a portion of those people left the trial believing they were losing too much weight, according to the company, which unsettled some researchers outside the study. Eli Lilly funded the trial, which enrolled 445 participants. Definitive conclusions about why patients dropped out remain difficult, since the full data set has yet to be published.

Dr. David Hyman, chief medical officer at Eli Lilly, said, “We’re not trying to force a specific magnitude of weight loss in every patient.” Retatrutide, he added, will target patients who need to shed more pounds than other medications could help them lose. He also said, “We’re not of the belief that the most potent weight loss medicine is required for everybody, or that that’s even the goal.”

Pinpointing exactly what qualifies as excessive weight loss is tricky. Some people taking GLP-1s fret that their appearance simply seems off. Others — patients and doctors alike — worry that consuming so little food is harmful to health. Experts said that in still other cases, these medications might encourage disordered eating.

Concerns like these are being watched closely by researchers employed by the companies developing the drugs.

Dr. Ania Jastreboff, who directs the Yale Obesity Research Center and is a leading investigator who has studied retatrutide for Eli Lilly, said, “We have to use the dose that the patient needs.” She explained that the aim is to keep patients on the smallest effective dose. “The underlying question is needing to approach and treat obesity as we would any other chronic disease,” Dr. Jastreboff said.

Novo Nordisk — maker of Ozempic and Wegovy — says its strategy has shifted. For a late-stage trial of a new compound called CagriSema, which seems roughly as effective as other injectable obesity drugs now on the market, the company adopted a flexible dosing schedule. Under that approach, participants who couldn’t handle the side effects, or for whom a lower dose was already working, were allowed to remain at the smaller dose. Novo Nordisk filed for Food and Drug Administration approval of CagriSema in December and anticipates a greenlight later this year.

Maureen Chomko, a diabetes care and education specialist based in Seattle, treats patients with diabetes who take drugs such as Ozempic. When someone is shedding too many pounds, she said, “we’re having a good hard look at what this person is eating, why they aren’t eating.” Nausea from the drugs can be so severe, she said, that when patients finally manage to eat, a kale salad with salmon is not what they reach for — instead they’re trying to keep down a handful of crackers. She said she worries about people becoming malnourished and dehydrated on these medicines and urges patients to set alarms to remind themselves to eat

Ms. Chomko is working with the biopharmaceutical company Amgen on clinical trials for MariTide, a new monthly weight loss compound that is in development. She is helping train the dietitians who are involved with the studies, working to ensure participants get enough vitamin D, calcium, fiber and protein, nutrients that she frequently sees people on these medications failing to get in sufficient amounts.

Ms. Chomko said excess weight loss was “a visible sign that these meds have pushed someone too far.”

“But I think what I’m more concerned about is the invisible,” she added.

Doctors are trying to figure out how to advise patients who seem to be losing too much weight. Dr. Janice Jin Hwang, the division chief of endocrinology and metabolism at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, frequently sees patients who have hit what she called their “metabolic targets” on these medicines: Their blood sugar has fallen, their cardiovascular metrics have stabilized and they have reached their target weight. But then they want to lose even more.

“There are more nuanced discussions now about, how much weight does a person need to lose?” she said. And there is no clear pathway for doctors to ensure patients lose a Goldilocks amount of weight: not too much, not too little. She often ends up embarking on a kind of trial and error, seeing if patients can maintain their progress on a lower maintenance dose, with the understanding that they will almost certainly need to stay on the drugs for the rest of their lives to do so.

Dr. Sahib S. Khalsa, a psychiatrist at the University of California at Los Angeles Health, coauthored a paper in 2024 about these medications titled: “Highway to the Danger Zone?” In it, the authors warn that people who take these drugs need to be strictly monitored to ensure that they eat and hydrate sufficiently and do not lose too much weight. The paper also notes that the medications are particularly risky for people with histories of disordered eating.

Since that paper was published, Dr. Khalsa said he has only grown more concerned.

Dr. Andrew Kraftson, a clinical associate professor at the University of Michigan Medical School, said that he had to stop a patient from continuing on the medications, because the person wanted to keep losing weight, even when there was no clear medical benefit to doing so.

“We have to recognize that society has brainwashed us all to certain beauty standards that are not always in alignment with health standards,” Dr. Kraftson said. “And so just because someone can starve themselves to get down to a lower weight doesn’t mean that we should make that easier by giving them an injection to promote anorexia.”
 
In that article, the responses from the Doctors contain a great number of points I do not agree with. Fear mongering news pieces like this are really par for the course, and the same goes for a handful of fear mongering scientific papers, which are frequently penned by individuals whose entire area of research or clinical work has been blown up by how effective GLP drugs are at producing weight loss when set against older choices.

For the majority of people dealing with more severe obesity that has lasted their whole lives, an article of this sort is simply misleading. The real issue is that these drugs are not yet good enough, rather than being too good. Take retatrutide: its average result is 29% loss, which is a big help to somebody with a bmi of 50, yet after that 29% comes off they will still be overweight or obese. Right now the drug companies are pouring billions into add on drugs for GLP's to address this very problem.

Maureen Chomko worries that people on GLP's eat less healthily, yet more than one study has demonstrated that preferences shift on GLP medications toward foods that are lower fat, lower sugar and less processed. That is not to say the occasional person won't get bad nausea and end up with limited food choices, but when that happens it is time to reduce the dose. An easy fix, and not a problem with the drug.

When people have to stop the drug because they are losing too much weight, that is purely an artefact of a study requiring patients to take fixed doses. In any real world situation you do not keep increasing the dose if too much weight is being lost, or is being lost too quickly, and doses can be reduced rather than stopped, since most people will simply put the weight back on if you stop them.

My own view is that GLP medications will turn out to be the most effective and preferred treatment for the most common of all eating disorders, binge eating disorder or food addiction with associated obesity. The science is not there on that yet but I believe it will get there. Clearly nobody wants people with anorexia nervosa taking GLP's, but unless the patient is getting them on the grey or black market, doctors are not going to be prescribing them for people with that problem, since it is fairly obvious if someone is that thin. They might even prove useful for bulimia.

Dr. Sahib S. Khalsa, a psychiatrist and author of “Highway to the Danger Zone?” .. The evidence does not support his concerns, see above for eating disorder issues. Unless people have severe medical issues or severe gi side effects, people can usually manage their hydration just fine. And if they do have adverse effects, then yes people do need advice on side effects before treatment, and advice and treatment if they do have vomiting or diarrhoea, including reducing doses or stopping the drugs. This is just standard practice.

Dr. Andrew Kraftson, a clinical associate professor, what he says is mostly reasonable, but there is very little evidence of medical benefit of getting BMI to much below about 30, so if a patient would prefer to be at a bmi of 22 or 25 who should be deciding, the doctor or the person themselves? The adverse social consequences of obesity are very real, and peoples concerns about this are legitimate. The fact that it would be better if we lived in a less judgemental society is really beside the point, and again doctors are not going to prescribe GLP's to people who are obviously underweight.
 
Too effective!?

Oh no, my steak is overly succulent and my lobster has too much butter.
 
The real benefit of the Grey method up to now (price aside) is this:

The "modular approach" — the person at the end gets to choose, according to their own results and/or what they prefer, the amount and the timing.

Right now the wider medical field is tied to following "protocols". Whether because they lack knowledge or because they dread what might happen if they ever propose a more individualized path.
 
Mr. Blonde said:

Too effective!?

Oh no, my steak is overly succulent and my lobster has too much butter.

Haha, when it comes to cash or being thin, there's no such thing as enough 😂! Only joking…. though perhaps I'm not joking 😏.
 
With telehealth providers, text-based messaging is always an option — that's how the compounding outfits such as Brello Health typically operate.

Good-Heart6425 said:

View attachment 11031



A New Concern About Weight Loss Drugs: What if They Work Too Well?



Some patients in a clinical trial of one new drug lost so much weight that they became concerned and dropped out.

View attachment 11032


www.nytimes.com

A New Concern About Weight Loss Drugs: What if They Work Too Well?​#-a-new-concern-about-weight-loss-drugs-what-if-they-work-too-wellSome patients in a clinical trial of one new drug lost so much weight that they became concerned and dropped out.

By Dani Blum

Feb. 18, 2026

Leer en español

For years, scientists pushed to create medications capable of shedding as many pounds as possible. These days, the industry is easing off the gas.

According to recent top-line results from a trial of retatrutide — a compound under development at Eli Lilly — patients who had obesity along with knee osteoarthritis shed 28.7 percent of their body weight on average, measured after 68 weeks at the highest dose. By comparison, weight-loss drugs presently on the market have produced roughly 20 percent body weight reduction across that same span.

Side effects drove somewhere between 12 and 18 percent of trial participants to quit — a share larger than what is usually seen in studies of existing weight-loss drugs. At least a portion of those people left the trial believing they were losing too much weight, according to the company, which unsettled some researchers outside the study. Eli Lilly funded the trial, which enrolled 445 participants. Definitive conclusions about why patients dropped out remain difficult, since the full data set has yet to be published.

Dr. David Hyman, chief medical officer at Eli Lilly, said, “We’re not trying to force a specific magnitude of weight loss in every patient.” Retatrutide, he added, will target patients who need to shed more pounds than other medications could help them lose. He also said, “We’re not of the belief that the most potent weight loss medicine is required for everybody, or that that’s even the goal.”

Pinpointing exactly what qualifies as excessive weight loss is tricky. Some people taking GLP-1s fret that their appearance simply seems off. Others — patients and doctors alike — worry that consuming so little food is harmful to health. Experts said that in still other cases, these medications might encourage disordered eating.

Concerns like these are being watched closely by researchers employed by the companies developing the drugs.

Dr. Ania Jastreboff, who directs the Yale Obesity Research Center and is a leading investigator who has studied retatrutide for Eli Lilly, said, “We have to use the dose that the patient needs.” She explained that the aim is to keep patients on the smallest effective dose. “The underlying question is needing to approach and treat obesity as we would any other chronic disease,” Dr. Jastreboff said.

Novo Nordisk — maker of Ozempic and Wegovy — says its strategy has shifted. For a late-stage trial of a new compound called CagriSema, which seems roughly as effective as other injectable obesity drugs now on the market, the company adopted a flexible dosing schedule. Under that approach, participants who couldn’t handle the side effects, or for whom a lower dose was already working, were allowed to remain at the smaller dose. Novo Nordisk filed for Food and Drug Administration approval of CagriSema in December and anticipates a greenlight later this year.

Maureen Chomko, a diabetes care and education specialist based in Seattle, treats patients with diabetes who take drugs such as Ozempic. When someone is shedding too many pounds, she said, “we’re having a good hard look at what this person is eating, why they aren’t eating.” Nausea from the drugs can be so severe, she said, that when patients finally manage to eat, a kale salad with salmon is not what they reach for — instead they’re trying to keep down a handful of crackers. She said she worries about people becoming malnourished and dehydrated on these medicines and urges patients to set alarms to remind themselves to eat

Ms. Chomko is working with the biopharmaceutical company Amgen on clinical trials for MariTide, a new monthly weight loss compound that is in development. She is helping train the dietitians who are involved with the studies, working to ensure participants get enough vitamin D, calcium, fiber and protein, nutrients that she frequently sees people on these medications failing to get in sufficient amounts.

Ms. Chomko said excess weight loss was “a visible sign that these meds have pushed someone too far.”

“But I think what I’m more concerned about is the invisible,” she added.

Doctors are trying to figure out how to advise patients who seem to be losing too much weight. Dr. Janice Jin Hwang, the division chief of endocrinology and metabolism at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, frequently sees patients who have hit what she called their “metabolic targets” on these medicines: Their blood sugar has fallen, their cardiovascular metrics have stabilized and they have reached their target weight. But then they want to lose even more.

“There are more nuanced discussions now about, how much weight does a person need to lose?” she said. And there is no clear pathway for doctors to ensure patients lose a Goldilocks amount of weight: not too much, not too little. She often ends up embarking on a kind of trial and error, seeing if patients can maintain their progress on a lower maintenance dose, with the understanding that they will almost certainly need to stay on the drugs for the rest of their lives to do so.

Dr. Sahib S. Khalsa, a psychiatrist at the University of California at Los Angeles Health, coauthored a paper in 2024 about these medications titled: “Highway to the Danger Zone?” In it, the authors warn that people who take these drugs need to be strictly monitored to ensure that they eat and hydrate sufficiently and do not lose too much weight. The paper also notes that the medications are particularly risky for people with histories of disordered eating.

Since that paper was published, Dr. Khalsa said he has only grown more concerned.

Dr. Andrew Kraftson, a clinical associate professor at the University of Michigan Medical School, said that he had to stop a patient from continuing on the medications, because the person wanted to keep losing weight, even when there was no clear medical benefit to doing so.

“We have to recognize that society has brainwashed us all to certain beauty standards that are not always in alignment with health standards,” Dr. Kraftson said. “And so just because someone can starve themselves to get down to a lower weight doesn’t mean that we should make that easier by giving them an injection to promote anorexia.”

Clearly, neither a salmon nor a kale typed that.

lessthanhalf said:

In that article, the responses from the Doctors contain a great number of points I do not agree with. Fear mongering news pieces like this are really par for the course, and the same goes for a handful of fear mongering scientific papers, which are frequently penned by individuals whose entire area of research or clinical work has been blown up by how effective GLP drugs are at producing weight loss when set against older choices.

For the majority of people dealing with more severe obesity that has lasted their whole lives, an article of this sort is simply misleading. The real issue is that these drugs are not yet good enough, rather than being too good. Take retatrutide: its average result is 29% loss, which is a big help to somebody with a bmi of 50, yet after that 29% comes off they will still be overweight or obese. Right now the drug companies are pouring billions into add on drugs for GLP's to address this very problem.

Maureen Chomko worries that people on GLP's eat less healthily, yet more than one study has demonstrated that preferences shift on GLP medications toward foods that are lower fat, lower sugar and less processed. That is not to say the occasional person won't get bad nausea and end up with limited food choices, but when that happens it is time to reduce the dose. An easy fix, and not a problem with the drug.

When people have to stop the drug because they are losing too much weight, that is purely an artefact of a study requiring patients to take fixed doses. In any real world situation you do not keep increasing the dose if too much weight is being lost, or is being lost too quickly, and doses can be reduced rather than stopped, since most people will simply put the weight back on if you stop them.

My own view is that GLP medications will turn out to be the most effective and preferred treatment for the most common of all eating disorders, binge eating disorder or food addiction with associated obesity. The science is not there on that yet but I believe it will get there. Clearly nobody wants people with anorexia nervosa taking GLP's, but unless the patient is getting them on the grey or black market, doctors are not going to be prescribing them for people with that problem, since it is fairly obvious if someone is that thin. They might even prove useful for bulimia.

Dr. Sahib S. Khalsa, a psychiatrist and author of “Highway to the Danger Zone?” .. The evidence does not support his concerns, see above for eating disorder issues. Unless people have severe medical issues or severe gi side effects, people can usually manage their hydration just fine. And if they do have adverse effects, then yes people do need advice on side effects before treatment, and advice and treatment if they do have vomiting or diarrhoea, including reducing doses or stopping the drugs. This is just standard practice.

Dr. Andrew Kraftson, a clinical associate professor, what he says is mostly reasonable, but there is very little evidence of medical benefit of getting BMI to much below about 30, so if a patient would prefer to be at a bmi of 22 or 25 who should be deciding, the doctor or the person themselves? The adverse social consequences of obesity are very real, and peoples concerns about this are legitimate. The fact that it would be better if we lived in a less judgemental society is really beside the point, and again doctors are not going to prescribe GLP's to people who are obviously underweight.

Try saying that to my Achilles tendinopathy.
 
Back
Top