GreenOlives
Explorer
Caught this on a podcast yesterday. Are any runners here taking it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My brother in law is 63 years old and has run virtually every day for about 7 years—he skipped just 1 day. Lol, the guy is an absolute machine.Turbo-Farmer said:
My Fitbit shows my vo2 max went from 39 up to 42, and I haven't stepped up my running at all since beginning MOTS-C.
Running isn't really my thing — I've just been doing 2 miles daily for 30 months.
Searching Google Scholar, I couldn't locate any human trials that used mots-c therapeutically. There's plenty of research on its concentrations across different situations and health states, plus many experiments where it's administered to rodents, yet nothing involving people that I can find. Should you have a citation showing where that claim originated, I'd be interested in checking it out.GreenOlives said:
Caught this on a podcast yesterday. Are any runners here taking it?
lessthanhalf said:
Searching Google Scholar, I couldn't locate any human trials that used mots-c therapeutically. There's plenty of research on its concentrations across different situations and health states, plus many experiments where it's administered to rodents, yet nothing involving people that I can find. Should you have a citation showing where that claim originated, I'd be interested in checking it out.GreenOlives said:
Caught this on a podcast yesterday. Are any runners here taking it?
Running isn't something I do — never have, really. These days the only running I did was toward dinner, and even that's over. Still, there's 1 observation of mine that lines up with this idea: how I handle altitude. While "running" Mots-C, I've found that being at 7000' barely affects me. Climbing 3 flights of stairs leaves my breathing almost unchanged, and I bounce back within just a few seconds — something I never manage when I'm off it. On top of that, my resistance training feels stronger, letting me crank out 10-15 extra reps compared to off days. Whatever shifts on those days, I suspect vo2 max is the explanation.Turbo-Farmer said:
My Fitbit shows my vo2 max went from 39 up to 42, and I haven't stepped up my running at all since beginning MOTS-C.
Running isn't really my thing — I've just been doing 2 miles daily for 30 months.
The compound MOTS-c went by the name CB4211:lessthanhalf said:
Appreciate it — so far there's nothing to report. A phase 1 for this ought to exist, but I've had no luck tracking it down. Some studies simply never make it into print.
Calm Logic said:
In the phase 1 clinical trial of MOTS-c, the subq ISRs were one reason they didn't go forward, but they were doing a whopping 25 mg per day. But "no serious adverse events" from subq injections (pharma grade, not grey). It was a very small study (N=11).
Click to expand...
Is that chart showing your vo2 max? Which protocol do you follow?sidroponix said:
As a trail runner, my routine includes a 5k track session featuring 1000’ of elevation gain. After adding mots-c, I’ve not just been setting personal records on those runs—I’ve also been dominating my daily CrossFit WODs. On this stuff, I feel like a beast! I just reviewed my stats, and they line up pretty consistently with the period when I began mots-c lol
That chart is mine. My stack is 2mg of mots-c taken 3x/wk alongside tirz at 12.5mg 1x/week. As for training, I get out on my mountain 4-7days/week and also do CrossFit 5x/wkexxige said:
Is that chart showing your vo2 max? Which protocol do you follow?sidroponix said:
As a trail runner, my routine includes a 5k track session featuring 1000’ of elevation gain. After adding mots-c, I’ve not just been setting personal records on those runs—I’ve also been dominating my daily CrossFit WODs. On this stuff, I feel like a beast! I just reviewed my stats, and they line up pretty consistently with the period when I began mots-c lol
No — as of now, there is no direct human evidence that mots-c raises vo2. Anyone asserting that from the current data is definitely going too far. The sole human trials conducted on its development name (or a modified form of it), cb4211, consisted of a phase 1 study showing it was not toxic and might lower liver fat. A phase 2 study is underway. Since it is meant to act as an exerkine — a kind of exercise-mimicking hormone — it could plausibly do so; in rodents it does improve exercise tolerance, though I doubt vo2 was among the measurements taken in those studies.wildweasel said:
Is there real scientific proof behind the idea that MOTS-C raises VO2 max? Or is this just talk about something someone picked up from a podcast?
Has a mechanism even been put forward for this?
Medical literature says it boosts glucose uptake, which on its own could easily explain setting personal records on runs