DrPEPr
Explorer
In the same boat (12-15%), with 8-10% as the target for a photoshoot. I hit that range back in my younger days, and honestly after 40 it's way tougher to get there (I'm nearly 46Hotpeppers said:
I'm 43, and my reason for using it is skin health. Later on I was considering a switch to KLOW, so that I wouldn't need to pin 4 separate times. That one I'd want for skin health plus recovery time as wellbirdwhacker said:
It looks like AI is writing your comments for you. Claude is available to everyone here, so there's no point in dressing up its output to sound more human before posting it.Lion93 said:
At 3 mg weekly, Retatrutide is already a respectable dosage.Hotpeppers said:
Right now my weekly Reta dose is 3mg, motsc is 2mg taken every day, tesa is 1mg per day, and GHK-cu is also 1mg per day. Once I begin my bulk, I was considering swapping tesa out for CJC/ipa. At the moment I figure I'm sitting at roughly 13-15% body fat, so there's still a bit left to lose before the bulk starts. I realize HGH is the superior option, but I'd prefer to avoid shutting down my natural production. HGH is something I have never used.Lion93 said:
I don’t entirely agree with that.
Without knowing the exact dosages, there’s no way to judge the stack properly — you’d just be guessing.
And I don’t see a compelling case for throwing CJC (no DAC) + Ipamorelin into this. Sure, they hit different pathways, but realistically they don’t stack up to Tesamorelin when it comes to fat loss.
If Tesamorelin is being dropped and you still want that outcome, HGH is the better route.
CJC + Ipa = recovery / sleep
HGH = a stronger, more reliable fat loss signal
Once you’re at that level (8–10%), peptides matter less anyway — execution does.
As for 2 mg of MOTS-C taken every day — that works, though I'd prefer to run MOTS-C only on days you don't train.
A 1 mg dose of Tesamorelin is on the lower side. Most people would begin at about 2 mg instead.
Tesamorelin and HGH share a comparable pathway, but Tesamorelin goes about it indirectly — it tells the liver to ramp up IGF-1 output, and that in turn drives lipolysis. HGH, by contrast, works more directly within the body.
Whether 1 mg of GHK-Cu per day makes sense comes down to what you're after — skin, recovery, healing, and so on.
CJC-1295 plus Ipamorelin won't stand in for Tesamorelin. Their mechanisms of action differ.
On the subject of HGH: your body naturally makes about 1.5 IU each day, and that output usually bounces back once you quit using HGH.
Ultimately, the choice of what suits your goal is yours — what I've laid out is simply the stack I'd suggest.
As for the original poster: what's your age? From what I've seen, GHK-Cu mainly benefits people who are 40 or older.
Will be going into a bulk
appreciate it. Yeah, that goal is a hard one, but I know diet and exercise will get me there. When I reach it, my plan is to shift the diet toward a bulk with more calories, protein and carbs. That's the point where I was thinking of moving to CjC and ipa, no longer for fat loss. Right now I'm around 12-15%, and my abs are starting to creep out lolDrPEPr said:
Hello, and welcome to GLP1Chat.
Sitting at 8%-10% body fat is seriously impressive.
If losing fat is what you care about most, my own pick would be hgh rather than a secretogoblin like tesa, ipa, or cjc.
Best of luck hitting your target!
We can do this man
CJC+Ipa went in for me, less for dropping fat and more for improved sleep (which tends to go sideways while dieting), and up to now it's been solid.