I've been wondering how anyone can tell what is truly responsible for a result when multiple variables influence the same endpoint. Weekly calories could stay roughly constant, yet appetite, the timing of meals, water retention and training can each move the scale.
When someone is looking into a stack of compounds, it becomes even trickier, because a shift in weight or hunger doesn't reveal which of the factors is behind it.
To those who keep up with research on GLP-1s and other peptides, what would your method be for comparing outcomes across a few weeks? Which would you put first — bodyweight averages, waist measurements, appetite changes or training performance — and how long would you let each trend run before you conclude anything?
When someone is looking into a stack of compounds, it becomes even trickier, because a shift in weight or hunger doesn't reveal which of the factors is behind it.
To those who keep up with research on GLP-1s and other peptides, what would your method be for comparing outcomes across a few weeks? Which would you put first — bodyweight averages, waist measurements, appetite changes or training performance — and how long would you let each trend run before you conclude anything?