BNLFL said:
Well, all the grey stuff I get is testing is set by the Group Promotion Vendor (Group Promotion Vendor) and most don't send it till it passes, but some ship it and wait for the test results. If it's bad, they get new stuff. You need to feel out and read these GB groups.
Click to expand...
How is this different than blindly trusting vendor test results?
True, trustworthy testing of "group buy" products relies on a number (usually 3-6 depending on the size of the group) of buyers being selected at random (not by the "organizer") to donate a vial for testing once they've received their order.
Then the "organizer" sends each volunteer a prepaid label to ship their donor vials to one of the other donating members of the group who has volunteered to be the collection point.
Finally, the collection volunteer sends all of the donor vials to the selected lab for testing using a prepaid label provided by the "organizer". (All of the shipping labels and cost of lab testing are included as part of the cost of the purchase.)
This is the only way of meaningfully ensuring that the "organizer" can't manipulate the test results, by removing any influence or control over which vials ultimately end up being tested. While not impossible, the "organizer" would have to engineer a pretty sophisticated scheme and engage the assistance of a lot of people to corrupt this process; and such schemes rarely go undetected or stay secret for long in this space.
Outside of this type of random testing process, any other "organizer" provided test results are no different than "Maryanne" from "CCPY Peptides" in China from sending known good samples of 'peptide X' to a lab for the best possible test results, while shipping unsuspecting customers a product which may not test as well. The critical difference being that unlike the natural, prudent skepticism of never trusting vendor results and engaging in private third-party testing, people trusting these "organizers" are highly unlikely to bother with their own testing.