randompersonrandom said:
Worth keeping in mind: a physician's actual duty is to inform you as well as their professional expertise allows, respond to your questions, explain what risks come with a given choice, and then back you up as best they can once you've decided what to do next.
What a physician is NOT there for is handing down orders, assuming you'll comply, and reprimanding you when you don't. I wouldn't tolerate that from ANY physician, and I doubt many would even attempt it if I spelled out what I expected from them.
Last 2 visits, my physician pushed statins and wanted me to stop smoking. I wasn't ready to give up cigarettes, and I wasn't ready to agree that statins were needed. I told him I'd begin a GLP-1, bring my weight down, and then reassess. He replied that even if I quit smoking, he doubted it would change enough. I told him fine, I'd see how it played out. If more than 6 months pass, my weight reaches normal, and LDL remains too high, we'd discuss either quitting smoking or statins; but not both simultaneously. He explained what that does to my cardiac event risk. I thanked him. We left as teammates.
At the following appointment, if my LDL is still elevated, I'm still refusing statins. My cigarette quit date is 8/1. We'll give THAT some time, then retest after a sensible interval. If it's still high, then statins. I get what that means for my risk level right now, because he told me, because that's what my insurance pays him to do. He is NOT an authority over me, and even if he believed he were, he still wouldn't be.
I bring this up because yours isn't an authority over you either. Fine, they're glp-1 negative. That's okay, they can say so, and they can explain why. You chose to go on them. They have to accept that, and they still have to do right by you even if you didn't obey them; and you're entitled to, in a completely cordial manner, hold them to it.