_220Progress
Explorer
We can bring it back!
All of us are the human trials.
Sharing the data is important.
All of us are the human trials.
Sharing the data is important.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you explain a little more please? Are you saying that the PBS did not create the pain in Subject B and that you are going to use PBS only to reconstitute the vials of ARA-290? Or are you simply saying it is safe to do so and that the PH stays in line if you do?_220Progress said:
July 1 update:
Subject A - Increased walk time by 12 seconds without pain.
Subject B - No changes
We were able to to test both subjects vials and we have found the injection site issues root cause.
The PBS was at 10X strength.
This caused the compounds to be painful.
The study: it was a human trial of 4mg-6mg-8mg.
Has the proper reconstitution recipe of PBS:
“(20 mmol/L sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, 1% sucrose and 4% d-mannitol. The results of pharmacokinetic analyses performed in normal volunteers show that following 4 mg SC, a peak plasma level ~3 ng/mL (~2.4 nmol/L) was obtained with a terminal half-life of ~20 min (21). Preclinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data has shown that beneficial effects of ARA 290 occur when plasma concentrations exceed 1 nmol/L (2)”
ARA 290, a Nonerythropoietic Peptide Engineered from Erythropoietin, Improves Metabolic Control and Neuropathic Symptoms in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes - PMC
Although erythropoietin ameliorates experimental type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, serious side effects limit its potential clinical use. ARA 290, a nonhematopoietic peptide designed from the structure of erythropoietin, interacts selectively with ...
![]()
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
That confirms that PBS can be used alone to recon ARA-290 at the CORRECT strength.
Next step: Taking 5 new vials of ARA-290 and properly reconstituting for continued use.
Click to expand...
Correct.FLglpguy said:
Can you explain a little more please? Are you saying that the PBS did not create the pain in Subject B and that you are going to use PBS only to reconstitute the vials of ARA-290? Or are you simply saying it is safe to do so and that the PH stays in line if you do?
Click to expand...
Thank you for sharing. Mind sharing how you reconned?DazDillinger said:
I tried 4 mg for like 40 days I have sciatica and peripheral neuropathy unfortunately it did nothing
Click to expand...
I used hospira bac. It clumped initially but after it sat overnight all the vials were clear by the morning._220Progress said:
Thank you for sharing. Mind sharing how you reconned?
Click to expand...
Subject B was only ARA.DunningKruger said:
Curious. Does Subject B experience ISRs to only the ARA? Or to the KLOW as well? Is there also a history of allergy/autoimmunity in Subject B?
Click to expand...
Any updates? Hope all is well..._220Progress said:
Week of July 11-18
Both subjects are in daily 4mg SubQ injections of ARA-290.
Additional peptides are: KLOW 4mg daily and 1mg BPC-157. Subject A BPC-156 sight location lower back Subject B BPC-157 location is above knee thigh area of nerve impinged leg.
Subject A has seen increased time until pain during walks. Last logged time was 6:22 until pain began.
Subject has asked to continue treatments beyond 28 days if possible.
Subject B has not stated any improvement on nerve pain of left leg during the day. However, nightly sleep tracking has shown a 60% decrease in awaking events and restlessness. Subject states sleep has improved significantly.
They also wish to continue treatments beyond 28 days if possible.
Click to expand...